ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Females represent 49.6% of the global population and constitute a significant proportion of surgical patients and hospital admissions. Little is known about the bi-directional effects of sex and anesthetics or the impact of anesthetic interventions on long-term female health outcomes. Sex differences in pain pathways can influence pain experience and treatment effectiveness. The impact of anesthetic management on the recurrence of breast cancer is poorly understood, as are the long-term consequences of cardiovascular disease and safe and effective treatments in pregnancy. This review aims to outline recent advances in translational science in female health anesthesiology research and highlight critical research opportunities in pain, cancer outcomes, and cardiovascular disorders. Methods: We searched PubMed and summarized relevant articles published in English between December 2021 and June 2022. Key Content and Findings: Studies reveal sex differences in pain pathways and highlight the importance of sex as a biological variable in experimental designs and translational medicine. Sex differences have also been observed in side effects attributed to opioid analgesics. We summarize some of the neural circuits that might underlie these differences. In the perioperative setting, specific anesthetics are implicated in metastatic seeding potential and acute and chronic pain outcomes, suggesting the importance of anesthetic selection in comprehensive care during oncologic surgery. In the peridelivery setting, preeclampsia, a cardiovascular disorder of pregnancy, affects maternal outcomes; however, biomarkers can risk-stratify females at risk for preeclampsia and hold promise for identifying the risk of adverse neurological and other health outcomes. Conclusions: Research that builds diagnostic and predictive tools in pain and cardiovascular disease will help anesthesiologists minimize sex-related risks and side effects associated with anesthetics and peri-hospital treatments. Sex-specific anesthesia care will improve outcomes, as will the provision of practical information to patients and clinicians about the effectiveness of therapies and behavioral interventions. However, more research studies and specific analytic plans are needed to continue addressing sex-based outcomes in anesthesiology.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments related to preeclampsia after pregnancy have been reported; however, it is not known if weaknesses in cognition occur before and shortly after delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of longitudinal cognitive testing before and after delivery, and to investigate whether those with preeclampsia have cognitive weaknesses during the third trimester of pregnancy and at 1 and 3 months postpartum. We hypothesized that people with preeclampsia would have lower cognition scores across all time points compared with normotensive people. STUDY DESIGN: This longitudinal, prospective, observational study in a single institution enrolled people (N=30) at ≥28 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia (N=16) or normotension (N=14). People with chronic hypertension, neurologic or developmental disabilities, moderate or severe depression or anxiety, or current substance use were excluded. Subjective (Everyday Cognition Scale) and objective assessment of executive function (Stroop Color-Word Interference Test, Trail-Making Test), attention and working memory (Digit Span subtest), and information processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) was conducted, and Z-scores were calculated. Baseline characteristics (eg, prepregnancy body mass index) were collected from the medical record. Generalized linear models were used to estimate associations. RESULTS: We enrolled 37% (30/81) of eligible people and retained 80% (24/30) and 53% (16/30) at 1 and 3 months postpartum, respectively. People with preeclampsia reported more memory problems (ß=0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.31), and scored worse on attention and working memory (ß=-0.94; 95% confidence interval, -1.42 to -0.45) and executive function (Stroop test ß=-0.86; 95% confidence interval, -1.53 to -0.19) domains compared with normotensive people after adjusting for time, age, education, and prepregnancy body mass index. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal assessment of cognition in pregnant preeclamptic and normotensive people is feasible. People with preeclampsia reported worse subjective memory and had lower scores in attention, working memory, and executive function.
